Large language models (LLMs) often produce errors, including factual inaccuracies, biases, and reasoning failures, collectively referred to as "hallucinations". Recent studies have demonstrated that LLMs' internal states encode information regarding the truthfulness of their outputs, and that this information can be utilized to detect errors. In this work, we show that the internal representations of LLMs encode much more information about truthfulness than previously recognized. We first discover that the truthfulness information is concentrated in specific tokens, and leveraging this property significantly enhances error detection performance. Yet, we show that such error detectors fail to generalize across datasets, implying that -- contrary to prior claims -- truthfulness encoding is not universal but rather multifaceted. Next, we show that internal representations can also be used for predicting the types of errors the model is likely to make, facilitating the development of tailored mitigation strategies. Lastly, we reveal a discrepancy between LLMs' internal encoding and external behavior: they may encode the correct answer, yet consistently generate an incorrect one. Taken together, these insights deepen our understanding of LLM errors from the model's internal perspective, which can guide future research on enhancing error analysis and mitigation.

Work partially done during Apple internship
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
§ Google Research

Related readings and updates.

Mitigating Hallucinated Translations in Large Language Models with Hallucination-focused Preference Optimization

Machine Translation (MT) is undergoing a paradigm shift, with systems based on fine-tuned large language models (LLM) becoming increasingly competitive with traditional encoder-decoder models trained specifically for translation tasks. However, LLM-based systems are at a higher risk of generating hallucinations, which can severely undermine user's trust and safety. Most prior research on hallucination mitigation focuses on traditional MT models…
See paper details

Do LLMs Internally "Know" When They Follow Instructions?

This paper was accepted at the Foundation Model Interventions (MINT) Workshop at NeurIPS 2024. Instruction-following is crucial for building AI agents with large language models (LLMs), as these models must adhere strictly to user-provided guidelines. However, LLMs often fail to follow even simple instructions. To improve instruction-following behavior and prevent undesirable outputs, we need a deeper understanding of how LLMs’ internal states…
See paper details