Models That Prove Their Own Correctness
AuthorsNoga Amit†, Shafi Goldwasser†, Orr Paradise†, Guy N. Rothblum
Models That Prove Their Own Correctness
AuthorsNoga Amit†, Shafi Goldwasser†, Orr Paradise†, Guy N. Rothblum
How can we trust the correctness of a learned model on a particular input of interest? Model accuracy is typically measured on average over a distribution of inputs, giving no guarantee for any fixed input. This paper proposes a theoretically-founded solution to this problem: to train Self-Proving models that prove the correctness of their output to a verification algorithm V via an Interactive Proof. Self-Proving models satisfy that, with high probability over an input sampled from a given distribution, the model generates a correct output and successfully proves its correctness to V. The soundness property of V guarantees that, for every input, no model can convince V of the correctness of an incorrect output. Thus, a Self-Proving model proves correctness of most of its outputs, while all incorrect outputs (of any model) are detected by V. We devise and analyze two generic methods for learning Self-Proving models: Transcript Learning (TL) which relies on access to transcripts of accepting interactions, and Reinforcement Learning from Verifier Feedback (RLVF) which trains a model by emulating interactions with the verifier.
Doubly Sub-linear Interactive Proofs of Proximity
July 16, 2026research area Methods and Algorithms, research area Privacyconference Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS)
We study doubly sub-linear interactive proofs of proximity (dsIPPs): proofs that are ultra-fast to generate, and can be used to prove approximate assertions about a huge input. Proof generation is ultra-fast in the sense that it only requires reading a small (sub-linear) portion of the input. Approximate verification of the proof is even faster (reading an even smaller portion of the input). Similarly to the property testing literature,…
Revisiting ASR Error Correction with Specialized Models
July 6, 2026research area Methods and Algorithms, research area Speech and Natural Language Processing
Language models play a central role in automatic speech recognition (ASR), yet most methods rely on text-only models unaware of ASR error patterns. Recently, large language models (LLMs) have been applied to ASR correction, but introduce latency and hallucination concerns. We revisit ASR error correction with compact seq2seq models, trained on ASR errors from real and synthetic audio. To scale training, we construct synthetic corpora via cascaded…